Thursday, April 30, 2009

ANZ moves to Bangalor India

[ email message ]

Unfortunately this is where the issue lies, our settlement prep dept is in Bangalor India, this is why they do not guarantee the 10 day turn around time, but will try to get this done within that timeframel, I will keep on their backs.
 
I will get approx 3 days notification therefore it should give you ample time to book in settlement,
 
Thanks Bruce and apologies for the delay,
 

(name withheld)

Business Banking Manager 
Australian & New Zealand Banking Group Limited 

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Identity and the Land Registry


For the past 150 years, Land Registries^ have not conducted or insisted on identity checks in respect to the Register. How many titles are registered in false names? How many titles are registered in names where the proprietor is long dead. No one knows. And how does it matter? 

With anti-money laundering legislation and the advent of electronic conveyancing , identity has become a front and centre issue. Especially with the likelihood of the elimination of the duplicate certificate of title, the right to deal with the land is the central issue.

Today's rules are quite simple

  1. The right to deal with the land is you can produce the duplicate certificate of title
  2. The right to be registered on title is premised on production of the duplicate certificate of title and a transfer of land executed by the registered proprietor



Under an electronic conveyancing regime, the first premise is the duplicate certificate of title will not exist. (If this is not to be the case, what's the point to all this?) Legislation will have to be passed, which states, "upon this date the duplicate certificate of title will no longer be required to convey title" or words to that effect. The right to deal with land will solely be adduced by the entry on the Register. 

The rules under an electronic conveyancing regime

  1. The right to deal with the land is you can prove you are the person who is registered on the Register; and
  2. The right to be registered on the Register is an electronic transfer executed by the person, or his agent, who is registered on the Register

The right to deal with the Land

A vendor or borrower will no longer have to produce the duplicate certificate of title.

The right to deal with the land might be a combination

  • Security number issued to the registered proprietor 
    • as is the current practice with shares, a Shareholder Reference Number (SRN)
    • administratively, the SRN is sent to the address shown on the Register
    • the SRN is not publicly searchable
  • Proof of Identification
    • What standards will be set?
    • Who is qualified to carry out the test?



Proof of Identification (POI) 

What standards will be set?

FTRA (or 100-point) Standard

It is widely acknowledged the FTRA (or 100-point) Standard is an inadequate standard.

NECS and the Land Registries agree on this point.

The FTRA (or 100-point) Standard, although widely known and used, is more than 20 years old. It was devised before the development of desktop publishing and the wide availability of inexpensive, high-quality colour printing. It is generally considered to be from an era when identity fraud was much less of a problem generally and to Land Registries than it is today. While still a useful general-purpose standard, it is considered by Land Registries to be insufficiently rigorous for deterring fraud in land title transactions.

Unless the client is known to the conveyancer, production of identity documents does not cut it. Especially in an age where every student, from the age of 15, for the past 10 years or more has been dealing in false IDs.  How hard is it, or how easy is it, to produce false identity documents. Google "false ID" and GET YOUR FAKE ID HERE! screams out in capital letters. Scan, photoshop, print and laminate.

The FTRA standard is simply inadequate for an electronic conveyancing regime. 


**The Gold Standard

The Gold Standard recently developed by the Commonwealth Government as part of its National Identity Security Strategy (NISS) goes at least one step forward in solving the POI issue. And that is adding verification. A key principle of the Gold Standard is POI credentials and other information provided by the applicant should be verified with the relevant issuing authority or other authoritative source.

Which raises the question what are the procedures for document verification? Which also begs the question that at present, there are no systems which allows conveyancers to verify clients' credentials. In fact a conveyancer calling any government agency to verify a client's credentials will be met with a barrier of privacy concerns.

Which also raises the question are lawyers and conveyancers qualified to identify clients? Not beyond asking for  a copy of drivers licence or other identification.

The Gold Standard envisages enrolling agencies would enrol a person to a a Gold Standard (only once). This individual becomes a known customer. As a result, once an individual has been enrolled, this could be used to streamline enrolments with other agencies (ie Land Registries and applied to land registry transactions).


Who is qualified to carry out the test?

From the above analysis, It is clear that lawyers and conveyancers are not qualified to carry out POI tests, beyond attesting to knowing long standing clients.

It cannot be left to lawyers and conveyancers to carry the responsibility and liability for identity checks (at least not along the lines of the present FTRA 100 point standard)

Government and the Land Registries need to implement as part of its EC system a point of entry for lawyers and conveyancers to conduct verification checks^^ on credentials presented to them. 

Ipso facto, Land Registries are therefore hamstrung until government itself implements the essential elements of the NISS which covers verification checks, being what I believe is the minimum standard for electronic registration systems. 




Is there an alternative?

The government is concerned about the least possible call upon Torrens Assurance Funds for compensation in the event of registration fraud.*  I would suggest that in the absence of a system that permits lawyers and conveyancers to simply carry out verification checks (as iterated in Principle 7 of the NISS), the government will need to extend the Torrens Assurance Fund to cover and indemnify for losses due to identity fraud.


** NISS Gold Standard Paper 



Brett Hayton - 247legal










* The principles of Client Identity Verification are collectively intended to provide:
  • users of NECS with confidence in the authenticity of the transacting parties they are dealing with
  • transacting parties with confidence in the use of NECS by their representatives
  • the community with confidence in the integrity of the land title registers
  • the least possible call upon Torrens Assurance Funds for compensation in the event of registration fraud.

Source NECS paper


^ Exception - Lands NSW now has an identity check using the FTRA 100 point standard

cf. SA - The instrument must be witnessed by a person who either knows the executing party personally or is satisfied as to her or his identity.

Qld - A mortgagee intending to take a mortgage over freehold land as security for a debt or liability, must, prior to lodging a mortgage instrument for registration, take ‘reasonable steps’ to ensure that the person who executed the instrument as mortgagor is identical with the person who is, or who is about to become, the registered proprietor of the lot or the interest in the lot. Under the Land Title Act 1994, a mortgagee takes ‘reasonable steps’ if they comply with the practices included in this Manual. In essence, these practices reflect the ‘100 points of identification’ provisions under Commonwealth legislation governing certain financial transactions, namely, the Financial Transaction Reports Act 1988 (FTRA) and the Financial Transaction Reports Regulations 1990 (FTRR).

NECS National Project Team 
Client Identity Verification (CIV) Standard – a purpose built standard should be developed based on current practices in financial institutions under the Anti-Money Laundering legislation (March 2009)


^^ Identity Security and the National Document Verification Service


Impersonation - an article by bruce schneier

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Lending Landscape in Australia post GFC

Compared to the pre GFC era, there is very little competition for lending in Australia. After mergers and acquisitions by the Big 4 their market shares stands around 90%

  1. CBA (BankWest)
  2. ANZ
  3. NAB
  4. Westpac (St George & RAMS)

Thereafter, the alternatives stand as

  • Bendigo / Adelaide Bank
  • BEAT
  • heritage building society
  • ING
  • Homeloans Ltd
  • AMP
  • IMB
As the big banks get bigger, perhaps the differentiater for clients is service. Service by brokers and service by the lender pre and post settlement. 

Friday, April 03, 2009

Convert your fax into a scanner

Elecronic conveyancing doesn’t have a fixed definition.

NECS decribes it as an efficient and convenient way of completing property based transactions and lodging land title dealings for registration. In others word conducting a financial settlement electronically and registering land registry instruments electronically rather than with paper forms lodged over the counter.

247Legal has attempted to define electronic conveyancing - the system of exchanging sales & mortgage documentation and property data electronically between vendor & buyer, agent & lawyer, brokers & banks, government & land registry from point of sale to contract to settlement without (or with minimal) printed documentation.

Or perhaps electronic conveyancing can be as simple as being able to exchange documents electronically.

To be able to exchange documents electronically, by email for example, you have to be able to convert a paper document into an electronic document. The most common method is to use a scanner and the most common format is a PDF.

For the past 30 years, the fax has been the most common method for exchanging documents. If it has not yet happened, soon scanned to email documents will overtake the fax, which is common sense. But fax technology continues to dominate the industry, particularly with the 4 major banks. This is despite headlines for example that the approval times blow out at one major bank because its fax machines are being clogged (Herald Sun March 10, 2009). The banks' back office operations must be drowning in faxes, as testimony by the conveyancing industry provides in legions of stories of lost faxes.

 

 

Fax technology is redundant. Or it should be

If your office still does not own or use a scanner, 247Legal has done some bench testing on scanners and scanning options that might help you to cross over.

The bench test is a 15 page contract of sale using an enterprise and desktop scanner as well as a fax to email service. The scan test was timed from placing the document into the scanner or the fax

Toshiba Estudio 4511

 

37 seconds$14,315

Fujitsu duplex fi-4120C

 

1 minute 55 seconds$1,400
Mbox fax to email

57 seconds** being the time spent to send the fax

** the Brother MFC fax scans to memory, then sends and it may be several minutes before you receive the email with PDF attachment

$10 per month plus cost of local call

The Toshiba I would describe as the mothership won hands down. But for the price of a small car, you want to be pumping out volume. But then again this is a true multi function device, for a fully networked print, copy, scan solution.

The Fujistu is a great compact desktop scanner capable of scanning duplex. Having used this model for several years, the author can attest to its usefulness and reliability. The current model is the 6120, is faster than the 4120 and comes bundled with a full version of Adobe Acrobat which is a significant cost saving in itself.

If you are not ready to make the investment in a scanner of your own, there is an alternative that can transform your existing fax machine into a scanner. By subscribing to a fax to email service likembox.com.au, any business can convert their current fax machine to a scanner. Take any document, feed it into your fax, dial your mbox fax number, and voila a minute or two later, the sent fax will be back in your inbox as a "scanned" PDF. And the bonus is, because mbox is a fax to email service, all your inbound faxes can be delivered to you as email as well. Mbox provides an effective low cost alternative to buying a dedicated scanner. Its not quite retiring the fax, but its giving it a new lease of life. The basic mbox service costs $9.95 per month

Conveyancers and lawyers are in the paper business. Today, the scanner is a basic tool of trade. If you are not ready to buy, consider subscribing to a fax to email service to gain the benefits of the paper saving. Or if you can buy, buy the best your can afford. It will pay for itself many times over and it is part of the matrix that we call electronic conveyancing.

eDischarges: First element of eConveyancing in Ireland

The Property Registration Authority (PRA) in partnership with the Law Society andIrish Mortgage Council has developed a new online system which will enable lending institutions to request the cancellation of registered charges by electronic means without the need to submit any paper to the PRA. The new system – known as eDischarges - will be more secure, efficient and transparent than the existing process and will eliminate many of the inefficiencies and delays currently experienced when mortgages have been redeemed.

Catherine Treacy, Chief Executive of the PRA said “The launch of this new system for processing discharges of charges in a completely paperless environment is public validation of a significant amount of work undertaken over the past two years.  While planning and development work has been ongoing for several years this is the first public step on a journey that will ultimately lead to a complete system of electronic conveyancing in Ireland.  All of the parties, particularly the staff in the PRA who have worked on the development of this system, can take great pride in their achievement.  The PRA would like to place on record its sincere thanks for the contribution made by the Law Society and Irish Mortgage Council and our colleagues in the Revenue Commissioners and Companies Registration Office, to the successful delivery of the new eDischarges system.”

The development of an eDischarges capability by the PRA is central to the development of a national system of electronic registration of title (eRegistration). The launch of eDischarges will also mark the delivery of the first element of eConveyancing in Ireland.

Gabriel Brennan, Law Society eConveyancing Project Manager said “The Law Society is delighted to be involved in this exciting initiative and thanks the PRA staff and Irish Banking Federation (IBF)for working so closely with the legal profession on the design of this new system. As a result of this collaboration inefficiencies and delays in the release of registered charges will be eliminated. Also in conjunction with this project the Law Society and IBF have initiated a new streamlined procedure for requesting title deeds, redemption figures and discharge of a charge. Together these two initiatives represent significant reform of the conveyancing process. There remains, however, considerable work to be done to reach the ultimate goal of eConveyancing and the Law Society looks forward to building on this progress with the PRA and IBF in the coming years.” 

Three lending institutions - Permanent TSB, AIB and KBC Bank - will launch the live system on the 30th March 2009 and, two weeks later on the 14th April, the system will be available to all lenders.

Pat Farrell, Chief Executive of IBF said “There was great appreciation amongst IBF members for the constructive nature of the working relationship with both the PRA and the Law Society.  This dialogue has led to the first tangible milestone on the road towards a fully functioning eConveyancing system in Ireland. IBF welcomes the move towards a modern, paperless and streamlined conveyancing system. Ultimately, eConveyancing throughthe introduction of a technology driven process will benefit Irish consumers and other stakeholders in the form of enhanced consistency, transparency and reduction in time and costs. In the meantime, IBF looks forward to continued engagement with the PRA and Law Society to achieve further improvements to the conveyancing process.” 

Source  Sarah Long in Changes in land registry practice and procedure in other countries